Search Clinical Trials
Thank you for your interest in Vanderbilt research! Taking part in research is one way to be part of tomorrow’s health care discoveries. Vanderbilt is always looking for volunteers just like you so that our researchers can better understand how to prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. Everyone is needed. Both healthy volunteers and people with health conditions can help us answer important questions that impact the health of our communities. Ready to start searching for a study?
- Enter a health condition or leave it blank if you are looking to join any study as a healthy volunteer.
- Enter your gender and age.
- Click View Results.
- Click on the study titles for information.
- Click on Contact/Details tab to get information for contacting the study team.
Condition of Interest |
---|
The Immunology and Safety of Maternal RSV Vaccination (ABRYSVO), Infant Nirsevimab (BEYFORTUS) Immu1
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the leading cause of lower respiratory tract
infections (LRTIs) in infants and young children. It is also a leading cause of mortality
in children <5 years of age worldwide. Until recently, no Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)-approved vaccines were available t1 expand
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants and young children. It is also a leading cause of mortality in children <5 years of age worldwide. Until recently, no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines were available to prevent RSV infection. The only prophylactic product for RSV prevention recommended for infants was the monoclonal antibody palivizumab, but administration was limited to those with extreme prematurity, chronic lung disease, or hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. However, in 2023, the FDA approved two products designed to prevent RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in all infants: an active RSV vaccine based on the prefusion F protein (RSVpreF, ABRYSVO, Pfizer) administered during pregnancy, and a passive, long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab-alip [henceforth referred to as nirsevimab], BEYFORTUS, AstraZeneca) administered to infants at birth or at the start of their first RSV season. Both products were evaluated in Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials and have high efficacy in preventing LRTD caused by RSV in infants. Although there is no established correlate of protection against RSV, antibodies have been associated with protection across multiple studies. The clinical development plan for the products did not include comprehensive evaluations of the magnitude and durability of the immune response, nor were the two products tested in a single trial. This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label Phase 4 study with the primary objective of evaluating the magnitude and durability of RSV-specific neutralizing antibodies in infants through 12 months of life following either maternal RSV vaccination, infant nirsevimab administration, or both products combined. Type: Interventional Start Date: Sep 2024 |
Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Individuals With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed D1
Genetic Disease
Without an explanation for severe and sometimes life-threatening symptoms, patients and
their families are left in a state of unknown. Many individuals find themselves being
passed from physician to physician, undergoing countless and often repetitive tests in
the hopes of finding answers and insig1 expand
Without an explanation for severe and sometimes life-threatening symptoms, patients and their families are left in a state of unknown. Many individuals find themselves being passed from physician to physician, undergoing countless and often repetitive tests in the hopes of finding answers and insight about what the future may hold. This long and arduous journey to find a diagnosis does not end for many patients- the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR) notes that 6% of individuals seeking their assistance have an undiagnosed disorder. In 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) was established with the goal of providing care and answers for these individuals with mysterious conditions who have long eluded diagnosis. The NIH UDP is a joint venture of the NIH ORDR, the National Human Genome Research Institute Intramural Research Program (NHGRI-IRP), and the NIH Clinical Research Center (CRC) (1-3). The goals of the NIH UDP are to: (1) provide answers for patients with undiagnosed diseases; (2) generate new knowledge about disease mechanisms; (3) assess the application of new approaches to phenotyping and the use of genomic technologies; and (4) identify potential therapeutic targets, if possible. To date, the UDP has evaluated 3300 medical records and admitted 750 individuals with rare and undiagnosed conditions to the NIH Clinical Center. The NIH UDP has identified more than 70 rare disease diagnoses and several new conditions. The success of the NIH UDP prompted the NIH Common Fund to support the establishment of a network of medical research centers, the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), for fiscal years 2013-2020. The clinical sites will perform extensive phenotyping, genetic analyses, and functional studies of potential disease-causing variants. The testing performed on patients involves medically indicated studies intended to help reach a diagnosis, as well as research investigations that include a skin biopsy, blood draws, and DNA analysis. In addition, the UDN will further the goals of the UDP by permitting the sharing of personally identifiable phenotypic and genotypic information within the network. By sharing participant information and encouraging collaboration, the UDN hopes to improve the understanding of rare conditions and advance the diagnostic process and care for individuals with undiagnosed diseases. Type: Observational Start Date: Sep 2015 |
Volatility in Paranoia (VIP) Trial: An RCT of Changes in Volatility With Psychotherapy
Schizophrenia Disorders
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether learning and belief updating change
in response to the treatment of persecutory delusions, in individuals with
schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
The main questions are:
1. do prior expectations about environmental volatility reduce following e1 expand
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether learning and belief updating change in response to the treatment of persecutory delusions, in individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The main questions are: 1. do prior expectations about environmental volatility reduce following effective psychotherapeutic treatment of delusions? 2. does corresponding brain activity related to volatility change with effective treatment of delusions? Participants will: 1. engage in CBTp or TAU + phone check-ins for 16 weeks 2. complete assessments at 4 timepoints over the course of 6 months 3. complete an MRI when possible Type: Interventional Start Date: Jan 2025 |
A Phase III Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Iptacopan Compared With Place1
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase III
study, to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of iptacopan in patients with AChR+
gMG who are on stable SOC treatment. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will
be randomized in a ratio of 1:1, to r1 expand
The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study, to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of iptacopan in patients with AChR+ gMG who are on stable SOC treatment. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1, to receive either iptacopan or matching placebo, for 6 months (180 days) while continuing on a stable SOC treatment. The randomization will be stratified based on region. Type: Interventional Start Date: Jul 2024 |
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tulisokibart (MK-7240) in Participants With Moderate1
Crohn's Disease
The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in
participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Study 1's primary
hypotheses are that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to Placebo in the
proportion of participants achieving clinica1 expand
The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Study 1's primary hypotheses are that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to Placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 52 (US/FDA and EU/EMA), and that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to Placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (<150, US/FDA) or per stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA). Study 2's primary hypothesis is that at least 1 tulisokibart dose level is superior to Placebo in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (<150, US/FDA) or stool frequency and abdominal pain score (EU/EMA) and in the proportion of participants achieving endoscopic response at Week 12 (US/FDA and EU/EMA). Type: Interventional Start Date: Jun 2024 |
A Study to Determine if BHV-7000 is Effective and Safe in Adults With Idiopathic Generalized Epilep1
Generalized Epilepsy
The purpose of this study is to determine whether BHV-7000 is effective in the treatment
of idiopathic generalized epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures and includes an
additional open-label extension (OLE) phase. expand
The purpose of this study is to determine whether BHV-7000 is effective in the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures and includes an additional open-label extension (OLE) phase. Type: Interventional Start Date: Jun 2024 |
A Study to Determine if BHV-7000 is Effective and Safe in Adults With Refractory Focal Onset Epilep1
Focal Epilepsy
The purpose of this study is to determine whether BHV-7000 is effective in the treatment
of refractory focal epilepsy. expand
The purpose of this study is to determine whether BHV-7000 is effective in the treatment of refractory focal epilepsy. Type: Interventional Start Date: Mar 2024 |
Observational Study to Characterize Biomarkers and Disease Progression in Participants With Methyl1
Methyl CpG Binding Protein 2 (MECP2) Duplication Syndrome
The purpose of the study is to prospectively assess longitudinal changes in biomarkers
(MECP2, potential biomarkers of target engagement and disease activity) in cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) and blood; characterize longitudinal changes in performance on clinical
scales (clinician-reported measures of1 expand
The purpose of the study is to prospectively assess longitudinal changes in biomarkers (MECP2, potential biomarkers of target engagement and disease activity) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood; characterize longitudinal changes in performance on clinical scales (clinician-reported measures of neurodevelopment and functioning) and caregiver-reported outcome assessments (communication, gastrointestinal, social-emotional-adaptive behavioral measures); evaluate longitudinal changes in caregiver-reported health-related quality-of-life measures; and assess the frequency, type, and severity of seizures over time. Type: Observational Start Date: Oct 2023 |
Estradiol Therapy In Transgender Women to Research Interactions With HIV Therapy
HIV I Infection
Transgender women (TW) are a key population and priority for HIV treatment. More research
is needed to develop evidence-based clinical guidance when it comes to choosing
antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens for TW on feminizing hormonal therapy (FHT).
Concerns about ART interacting with FHT and1 expand
Transgender women (TW) are a key population and priority for HIV treatment. More research is needed to develop evidence-based clinical guidance when it comes to choosing antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens for TW on feminizing hormonal therapy (FHT). Concerns about ART interacting with FHT and decreasing its effectiveness can lead to decreased ART adherence and increased viral loads. The GET IT RiGHT trial aims to address concerns about drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between ART and FHT while providing access to hormonal therapy to TW living with HIV. Data suggest that access to FHT improves adherence to HIV treatment and decreases treatment interruptions. This is an open-label, non-randomized, 3-group trial of adult TW and other individuals identifying as female or transfeminine but with male sex assigned at birth living with HIV. Participants will be on ART at entry and receive study-supplied 17-β estradiol for FHT for 48 weeks. The primary objectives of the study are to 1) assess whether TW continue to achieve therapeutic concentrations of ART while receiving FHT for 48 weeks and 2) assess whether serum estradiol concentrations on FHT (across a range of estradiol doses) vary between boosted and un-boosted ART regimens. Type: Interventional Start Date: Jan 2024 |
High vs.Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) Recipients
Immunization; Infection
Transplantation Infection
Influenza
Influenza virus is a significant pathogen in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT)
recipients. However, these individuals respond poorly to standard-dose (SD) inactivated
influenza vaccine (IIV). Recent studies have investigated two strategies to overcome poor
immune responses in SOT recipients: (1 expand
Influenza virus is a significant pathogen in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, these individuals respond poorly to standard-dose (SD) inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV). Recent studies have investigated two strategies to overcome poor immune responses in SOT recipients: (1) administration of high-dose (HD)-IIV compared to SD-IIV and (2) two doses of SD-IIV compared to one dose of SD-IIV in the same influenza season. One study compared HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV in adult SOT recipients and noted that HD-IIV was safe and more immunogenic; however, the median post-transplant period was 38 months. A phase I pediatric study comparing a single dose of HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV was safe with higher immunogenicity, but the study was limited by small sample size and median post-transplant vaccine administration was 26 months. In another phase II trial of adult SOT recipients, two doses of SD-IIV one month apart compared to one-dose of SD-IIV revealed modestly increased immunogenicity when given at a median of 18 months post-transplant. Therefore, these studies lack both evaluation in the early post-transplant period and substantive pediatric populations. Additionally, the administration of two-doses of HD-IIV in the same influenza season has not been evaluated in pediatric SOT recipients. Thus, the optimal immunization strategy for pediatric SOT recipients less than 24 months post-transplant is unknown. In addition, immunologic predictors and correlates of influenza vaccine immunogenicity in pediatric SOT recipients have not been well-defined. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that pediatric SOT recipients 1-23 months post-transplant who receive two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have similar safety but higher Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) geometric mean titers (GMTs) to influenza antigens compared to pediatric SOT recipients receiving two doses of SD-QIV. Type: Interventional Start Date: Sep 2024 |
An Open-label Study Comparing Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan Versus Observation in PSMA Pos1
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (OMPC)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lutetium (177Lu)
vipivotide tetraxetan (AAA617) in participants with oligometastatic prostate cancer
(OMPC) progressing after definitive therapy to their primary tumor. The data generated
from this study will provide evidence for t1 expand
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan (AAA617) in participants with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) progressing after definitive therapy to their primary tumor. The data generated from this study will provide evidence for the treatment of AAA617 in early-stage prostate cancer patients to control recurrent tumor from progressing to fatal metastatic disease while preserving quality of life by delaying treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Type: Interventional Start Date: Mar 2024 |
PROACTIVE-HF-2 Trial Heart Failure NYHA Class II and III
Heart Failure NYHA Class II
Heart Failure NYHA Class III
Heart Failure
This is a prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized control clinical trial
evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Cordella™ Pulmonary Artery Sensor System in
NYHA Class II-III Heart Failure Patients (PROACTIVE-HF-2 Trial).
The study contains of 5 arms:
NYHA II Cohort - To demonstrate s1 expand
This is a prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized control clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Cordella™ Pulmonary Artery Sensor System in NYHA Class II-III Heart Failure Patients (PROACTIVE-HF-2 Trial). The study contains of 5 arms: NYHA II Cohort - To demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Cordella PA Sensor System in NYHA Class II HF patients, where patients have daily access to PAP data. - Treatment Arm (Group 1) - Active Control Arm (Group 2) - Crossover Arm (Group 3) NYHA III Cohort - To demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Cordella PA Sensor System in NYHA Class III HF patients, where patients have daily access to PAP data, including a randomized sub-study to evaluate a clinician-directed patient self-management strategy. Type: Interventional Start Date: Nov 2023 |
Evaluate REC-4881 in Patients with FAP
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
This is a multicenter, two-part trial in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
(FAP). expand
This is a multicenter, two-part trial in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). Type: Interventional Start Date: Jul 2023 |
Mismatched Related Donor Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Children, Ado1
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
This phase III trial compares hematopoietic (stem) cell transplantation (HCT) using
mismatched related donors (haploidentical [haplo]) versus matched unrelated donors (MUD)
in treating children, adolescents, and young adults with acute leukemia or
myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). HCT is considered s1 expand
This phase III trial compares hematopoietic (stem) cell transplantation (HCT) using mismatched related donors (haploidentical [haplo]) versus matched unrelated donors (MUD) in treating children, adolescents, and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). HCT is considered standard of care treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemia and MDS. In HCT, patients are given very high doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, which is intended to kill cancer cells that may be resistant to more standard doses of chemotherapy; unfortunately, this also destroys the normal cells in the bone marrow, including stem cells. After the treatment, patients must have a healthy supply of stem cells reintroduced or transplanted. The transplanted cells then reestablish the blood cell production process in the bone marrow. The healthy stem cells may come from the blood or bone marrow of a related or unrelated donor. If patients do not have a matched related donor, doctors do not know what the next best donor choice is. This trial may help researchers understand whether a haplo related donor or a MUD HCT for children with acute leukemia or MDS is better or if there is no difference at all. Type: Interventional Start Date: Mar 2023 |
Trial of Indication-Based Transfusion of Red Blood Cells in ECMO
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Organ Failure, Multiple
TITRE - Trial of Indication-based Transfusion of Red Blood Cells in ECMO, is a
multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. The overarching goal of TITRE is to
determine whether restricting red blood cell (RBC) transfusion according to an
indication-based strategy for those with bleeding an1 expand
TITRE - Trial of Indication-based Transfusion of Red Blood Cells in ECMO, is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. The overarching goal of TITRE is to determine whether restricting red blood cell (RBC) transfusion according to an indication-based strategy for those with bleeding and/or deficit of tissue oxygen delivery, compared with transfusion based on center-specific hemoglobin or hematocrit thresholds, can reduce organ dysfunction and improve later neurodevelopment in critically ill children receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support. Type: Interventional Start Date: Apr 2023 |
A Study of Tucatinib With Trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 Versus Standard of Care Treatment in First-line1
Colorectal Neoplasms
This study is being done to find out if tucatinib with other cancer drugs works better
than standard of care to treat participants with HER2 positive colorectal cancer. This
study will also determine what side effects happen when participants take this
combination of drugs. A side effect is anythin1 expand
This study is being done to find out if tucatinib with other cancer drugs works better than standard of care to treat participants with HER2 positive colorectal cancer. This study will also determine what side effects happen when participants take this combination of drugs. A side effect is anything a drug does to the body besides treating your disease. Participants in this study have colorectal cancer that has spread through the body (metastatic) and/or cannot be removed with surgery (unresectable). Participants will be assigned randomly to the tucatinib group or standard of care group. The tucatinib group will get tucatinib, trastuzumab, and mFOLFOX6. The standard of care group will get either: - mFOLFOX6 alone, - mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab, or - mFOLFOX6 with cetuximab mFOLFOX6 is a combination of multiple drugs. All of the drugs given in this study are used to treat this type of cancer. Type: Interventional Start Date: Oct 2022 |
A Study to See if Memantine Protects the Brain During Radiation Therapy Treatment for Primary Centr1
Central Nervous System Carcinoma
This phase III trial compares memantine to placebo in treating patients with primary
central nervous system tumors. Memantine may block receptors (parts of nerve cells) in
the brain known to contribute to a decline in cognitive function. Giving memantine may
make a difference in cognitive function1 expand
This phase III trial compares memantine to placebo in treating patients with primary central nervous system tumors. Memantine may block receptors (parts of nerve cells) in the brain known to contribute to a decline in cognitive function. Giving memantine may make a difference in cognitive function (attention, memory, or other thought processes) in children and adolescents receiving brain radiation therapy to treat a primary central nervous system tumors. Type: Interventional Start Date: May 2022 |
Nivolumab in Combination With Chemo-Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Primary Medi1
Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma
This phase III trial compares the effects of nivolumab with chemo-immunotherapy versus
chemo-immunotherapy alone in treating patients with newly diagnosed primary mediastinal
B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may
help the body's immune system atta1 expand
This phase III trial compares the effects of nivolumab with chemo-immunotherapy versus chemo-immunotherapy alone in treating patients with newly diagnosed primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Treatment for PMBCL involves chemotherapy combined with an immunotherapy called rituximab. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody. It binds to a protein called CD20, which is found on B cells (a type of white blood cell) and some types of cancer cells. This may help the immune system kill cancer cells. Giving nivolumab with chemo-immunotherapy may help treat patients with PMBCL. Type: Interventional Start Date: Oct 2021 |
The Pediatric Acute Leukemia (PedAL) Screening Trial - A Study to Test Bone Marrow and Blood in Chi1
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Post Cytotoxic Therapy
Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia
This study aims to use clinical and biological characteristics of acute leukemias to
screen for patient eligibility for available pediatric leukemia sub-trials. Testing bone
marrow and blood from patients with leukemia that has come back after treatment or is
difficult to treat may provide informat1 expand
This study aims to use clinical and biological characteristics of acute leukemias to screen for patient eligibility for available pediatric leukemia sub-trials. Testing bone marrow and blood from patients with leukemia that has come back after treatment or is difficult to treat may provide information about the patient's leukemia that is important when deciding how to best treat it, and may help doctors find better ways to diagnose and treat leukemia in children, adolescents, and young adults. Type: Interventional Start Date: Apr 2022 |
A Study of a New Way to Treat Children and Young Adults With a Brain Tumor Called NGGCT
Central Nervous System Nongerminomatous Germ Cell Tumor
Choriocarcinoma
Embryonal Carcinoma
Immature Teratoma
Malignant Teratoma
This phase II trial studies the best approach to combine chemotherapy and radiation
therapy (RT) based on the patient's response to induction chemotherapy in patients with
non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT) that have not spread to other parts of the
brain or body (localized). This study has1 expand
This phase II trial studies the best approach to combine chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) based on the patient's response to induction chemotherapy in patients with non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT) that have not spread to other parts of the brain or body (localized). This study has 2 goals: 1) optimizing radiation for patients who respond well to induction chemotherapy to diminish spinal cord relapses, 2) utilizing higher dose chemotherapy followed by conventional RT in patients who did not respond to induction chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs, such as carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, and thiotepa, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays or high-energy protons to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Studies have shown that patients with newly-diagnosed localized NGGCT, whose disease responds well to chemotherapy before receiving radiation therapy, are more likely to be free of the disease for a longer time than are patients for whom the chemotherapy does not efficiently eliminate or reduce the size of the tumor. The purpose of this study is to see how well the tumors respond to induction chemotherapy to decide what treatment to give next. Some patients will be given RT to the spine and a portion of the brain. Others will be given high dose chemotherapy and a stem cell transplant before RT to the whole brain and spine. Giving treatment based on the response to induction chemotherapy may lower the side effects of radiation in some patients and adjust the therapy to a more efficient one for other patients with localized NGGCT. Type: Interventional Start Date: Jul 2021 |
Study of Selinexor in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis
Myelofibrosis
This is a global, multicenter, 2-part study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor (JAKi) treatment-naïve myelofibrosis (MF)
participants. The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase 1 (open-label) and Phase 3
(double-blind). Phase 1 (enrollment comp1 expand
This is a global, multicenter, 2-part study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor (JAKi) treatment-naïve myelofibrosis (MF) participants. The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase 1 (open-label) and Phase 3 (double-blind). Phase 1 (enrollment completed) was an open-label evaluation of the safety and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in combination with ruxolitinib and included a dose escalation using a standard 3+3 design (Phase 1a) and a dose expansion part (Phase 1b). Phase 3 (ongoing), double-blind, placebo-controlled part of the study comparing the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of selinexor + ruxolitinib with combination of placebo + ruxolitinib. Type: Interventional Start Date: Mar 2021 |
ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD)
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD)
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD)
Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD)
Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA)
ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) represents the
formalized integration of ARTFL (U54 NS092089; funded through 2019) and LEFFTDS (U01
AG045390; funded through 2019) as a single North American research consortium to study
FTLD for 2019 and beyond. expand
ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) represents the formalized integration of ARTFL (U54 NS092089; funded through 2019) and LEFFTDS (U01 AG045390; funded through 2019) as a single North American research consortium to study FTLD for 2019 and beyond. Type: Observational Start Date: Mar 2020 |
Enasidenib for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With an IDH21
Recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
This phase II trial studies the side effects of enasidenib and sees how well it works in
treating pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia that has come back after
treatment (relapsed) or has been difficult to treat with chemotherapy (refractory).
Patients must also have a specific genetic ch1 expand
This phase II trial studies the side effects of enasidenib and sees how well it works in treating pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or has been difficult to treat with chemotherapy (refractory). Patients must also have a specific genetic change, also called a mutation, in a protein called IDH2. Enasidenib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking the mutated IDH2 protein, which is needed for leukemia cell growth. Type: Interventional Start Date: Aug 2023 |
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Post-Induction Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With High-Risk B-ALL, Mi1
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Central Nervous System Leukemia
Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia
Testicular Leukemia
This phase III trial studies whether inotuzumab ozogamicin added to post-induction
chemotherapy for patients with High-Risk B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
improves outcomes. This trial also studies the outcomes of patients with mixed phenotype
acute leukemia (MPAL), and B-lymphoblastic1 expand
This phase III trial studies whether inotuzumab ozogamicin added to post-induction chemotherapy for patients with High-Risk B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) improves outcomes. This trial also studies the outcomes of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), and B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LLy) when treated with ALL therapy without inotuzumab ozogamicin. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, called inotuzumab, linked to a type of chemotherapy called calicheamicin. Inotuzumab attaches to cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers calicheamicin to kill them. Other drugs used in the chemotherapy regimen, such as cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dexamethasone, doxorubicin, daunorubicin, methotrexate, leucovorin, mercaptopurine, prednisone, thioguanine, vincristine, and pegaspargase or calaspargase pegol work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. This trial will also study the outcomes of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) and disseminated B lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LLy) when treated with high-risk ALL chemotherapy. The overall goal of this study is to understand if adding inotuzumab ozogamicin to standard of care chemotherapy maintains or improves outcomes in High Risk B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (HR B-ALL). The first part of the study includes the first two phases of therapy: Induction and Consolidation. This part will collect information on the leukemia, as well as the effects of the initial treatment, to classify patients into post-consolidation treatment groups. On the second part of this study, patients with HR B-ALL will receive the remainder of the chemotherapy cycles (interim maintenance I, delayed intensification, interim maintenance II, maintenance), with some patients randomized to receive inotuzumab. The patients that receive inotuzumab will not receive part of delayed intensification. Other aims of this study include investigating whether treating both males and females with the same duration of chemotherapy maintains outcomes for males who have previously been treated for an additional year compared to girls, as well as to evaluate the best ways to help patients adhere to oral chemotherapy regimens. Finally, this study will be the first to track the outcomes of subjects with disseminated B-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-LLy) or Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (MPAL) when treated with B-ALL chemotherapy. Type: Interventional Start Date: Oct 2019 |
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Younger Patients With B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma or Relapsed or Ref1
Recurrent B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Recurrent B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Refractory B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
This phase II trial studies how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works in treating younger
patients with B-lymphoblastic lymphoma or CD22 positive B acute lymphoblastic leukemia
that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Inotuzumab
ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, ca1 expand
This phase II trial studies how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works in treating younger patients with B-lymphoblastic lymphoma or CD22 positive B acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, called inotuzumab, linked to a toxic agent called ozogamicin. Inotuzumab attaches to CD22 positive cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers ozogamicin to kill them. Type: Interventional Start Date: Jun 2017 |
- Previous
- Next