Purpose

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the difference in quality of life at one year postoperatively for patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with mesh versus suture repair using modern techniques. The main question it aims to answer are: • Determine if primary suture repair is non-inferior to mesh repair for incisional hernias 2-6cm with respect to quality of life using the HerQLes summary score at one year postoperatively.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults >18 years old. - Anticipated hernia defect 2-6cm in width - Non-emergent case - CDC class I - Patients who previously underwent primary ventral hernia repair without the use of mesh - Incisional hernia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Emergent cases - Patients < 18 years old - Patients who are pregnant - Patients who previously underwent a prior ventral hernia repair with mesh at the site of the intended repair. Abdominal mesh in separate locations would be allowed. - Ventral hernia <2cm or > 6 cm in width - Primary hernia - CDC wound class II-IV

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
Participants will be blinded to intervention. Recurrence on imaging will be assessed by blinded assessors

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Active Comparator
Hernia repair with mesh (Control arm)
Participants will undergo incisional hernia repair with prolene mesh in the retrorectus position with at least 4cm of overlap.
  • Procedure: Incisional hernia repair
    Participants will undergo incisional hernia repair
Active Comparator
Primary closure (Intervention arm)
Participants will undergo incisional hernia repair with suture alone using modern surgical techniques.
  • Procedure: Incisional hernia repair
    Participants will undergo incisional hernia repair

Recruiting Locations

Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Contact:
Richard Pierce, MD, PhD

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Clayton Petro

Study Contact

Clayton Petro, MD
2169242930
petroc@ccf.org

Detailed Description

This is a patient-blinded randomized control trial comparing incisional hernia repair using synthetic mesh versus suture repair. This is a non-inferiority trial theorizing that suture repair will be non-inferior with respect to quality of life (using the HerQLes survey) at 1 year postoperatively. Patients will be blinded to the intervention, groups will be in parallel.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.