The Immunology and Safety of Maternal RSV Vaccination (ABRYSVO), Infant Nirsevimab (BEYFORTUS) Immunization, or Both Products
Purpose
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants and young children. It is also a leading cause of mortality in children <5 years of age worldwide. Until recently, no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines were available to prevent RSV infection. The only prophylactic product for RSV prevention recommended for infants was the monoclonal antibody palivizumab, but administration was limited to those with extreme prematurity, chronic lung disease, or hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. However, in 2023, the FDA approved two products designed to prevent RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in all infants: an active RSV vaccine based on the prefusion F protein (RSVpreF, ABRYSVO, Pfizer) administered during pregnancy, and a passive, long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab-alip [henceforth referred to as nirsevimab], BEYFORTUS, AstraZeneca) administered to infants at birth or at the start of their first RSV season. Both products were evaluated in Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials and have high efficacy in preventing LRTD caused by RSV in infants. Although there is no established correlate of protection against RSV, antibodies have been associated with protection across multiple studies. The clinical development plan for the products did not include comprehensive evaluations of the magnitude and durability of the immune response, nor were the two products tested in a single trial. This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label Phase 4 study with the primary objective of evaluating the magnitude and durability of RSV-specific neutralizing antibodies in infants through 12 months of life following either maternal RSV vaccination, infant nirsevimab administration, or both products combined.
Condition
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Eligibility
- Eligible Ages
- Between 18 Years and 45 Years
- Eligible Genders
- Female
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- 18-45 years of age at time of enrollment with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy who are at no known increased risk for complications per clinical judgement of the investigator 2. Understands and agrees to comply with all study procedures 3. Willing and able to provide consent for study participation for themselves and their infant prior to initiation of any study procedures 4. In good health, as determined by the medical history and clinical judgment of the investigator Note: Healthy volunteers with pre-existing stable disease, defined as disease not requiring significant change in therapy or hospitalization for worsening disease during the 6 weeks before enrollment, can be included. 5. Intention to deliver at a hospital or birthing facility where study procedures can be performed 6. Eligible to receive either product per recommended guidelines at the recommended gestational age and during the recommended seasonal time period. (Maternal RSVpreF from 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks GA from September 1 to January)
Exclusion Criteria
- Behavioral or cognitive impairment or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the participant's ability to participate in the study 2. Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigators, may pose a health risk for the participant or interfere with the evaluation of study objectives 3. Maternal bleeding diathesis, or any condition which may contraindicate intramuscular injection 4. Maternal known or suspected congenital or acquired disease that impairs the immune system, including functional asplenia or immunosuppression due to underlying illness or treatment 5. Maternal receipt of immunosuppressive drugs or biologic agents within 30 days prior to enrollment (This includes oral or parenteral corticosteroids. The use of inhaled/nebulized, intra-articular, intrabursal, or topical (skin, eye, ears) steroids are permitted. This does not include RhoGAM) 6. Maternal conditions known to impair transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies (e.g., placental pathology, hypergammaglobulinemia, HIV) 7. Maternal history of GBS or other potentially immune-mediated medical condition (PIMMC) 8. Maternal history of severe adverse reaction or anaphylaxis to ABRYSVO or its components 9. Maternal history of preterm birth (<34 weeks GA) 10. Current pregnancy complicated by uncontrolled hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia 11. Previous receipt of ABRYSVO or other approved or investigational RSV vaccine
Study Design
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel Assignment
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None (Open Label)
Arm Groups
| Arm | Description | Assigned Intervention |
|---|---|---|
|
Experimental Group 1A |
Mother receives 120 mcg/0.5ml of maternal RSVpreF (ABRYSVO) administered intramuscularly once during 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks GA and infant does NOT receive nirsevimab. N= 50. |
|
|
Experimental Group 1B |
Mother receives 120 mcg/0.5ml of maternal RSVpreF (ABRYSVO) administered intramuscularly once during 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks GA and infant receives one dose of nirsevimab (BEYFORTUS) 50mg/0.5mL if body weight <5kg or 100mg/mL if body weight is >= 5kg at birth. N= 50. |
|
|
Experimental Group 1C |
Mother receives 120 mcg/0.5ml of maternal RSVpreF (ABRYSVO) administered intramuscularly once during 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks GA and infant receives one dose of nirsevimab (BEYFORTUS) 50mg/0.5mL if body weight <5kg or 100mg/mL if body weight is >= 5kg at 3-month . N= 50. |
|
|
Experimental Group 2 |
Mother does NOT receive maternal RSVpreF and infant receives one dose of nirsevimab (BEYFORTUS) 50mg/0.5mL if body weight <5kg or 100mg/mL if body weight is >= 5kg at birth . N= 50. |
|
Recruiting Locations
Nashville, Tennessee 37212
More Details
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Detailed Description
RSV is the leading cause of LRTIs in infants and young children. It is also a leading cause of mortality in children <5 years of age worldwide. Until recently, no FDA-approved vaccines were available to prevent RSV infection in infants. Only the monoclonal antibody palivizumab was available to high-risk infants, but administration was limited to those with extreme prematurity, chronic lung disease, or hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. However, in 2023, the FDA approved two products designed to prevent RSV LRTD in all infants: an active RSV vaccine based on the prefusion F protein (RSVpreF, ABRYSVO, Pfizer) administered during pregnancy and a passive, long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab, BEYFORTUS, AstraZeneca) administered to infants at birth or at the start of the first RSV season. Both products were evaluated in Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials and were found to have high efficacy in the prevention of RSV LRTD in infants. However, the magnitude and durability of antibody responses following administration of the products have not been directly compared. This is important because although there are no well-established correlates of protection against RSV, serum antibodies have been associated with protection across multiple studies. Furthermore, the added benefit of administering both products to an infant has not been characterized. While cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated that administration of both products to the same mother-infant dyad is not cost-effective or indicated, it is likely that some infants may receive both products inadvertently, and still others may benefit from both. These include infants born to women who may not have mounted an adequate antibody response to vaccination (e.g., due to immunocompromise, prematurity, or insufficient time from vaccination to delivery) or who may have had impaired antibody transfer across the placenta (e.g., due to placental pathology). It also includes high-risk infants (e.g., with prematurity or chronic lung disease) who may benefit from an interval dose of nirsevimab for protection in the setting of waning antibodies and off-season RSV circulation. Thus, understanding the safety and serology of administration of both products vs. either product alone is of clinical and public health importance. These knowledge gaps underlie the objectives for this study.